Can You Edit Jpeg Photos?

Can You Edit Jpeg Photos?

A JPEG, also one straight from the camera, has already been “created” by the image processor. Brightness, contrast, colour saturation, and even sharpening settings may have already been applied. A JPEG image’s appearance can be altered in an image processing programme, but since it is a compact medium intended to produce smaller file sizes, a lot of tonal and colour data is permanently lost during the encoding process.

As a consequence, the file has far fewer potential tonal values than a raw file with the same scene. This disparity can be vital for certain videos.

What exactly is a raw file?

When a digital camera captures an image, it saves it as raw data. If the camera format is JPEG, the raw data is stored and compressed before being stored in JPEG format.

When the camera format is set to raw, no processing is performed, so the file contains more tonal and colours files. There is more computing flexibility than a JPEG can have due to the larger amount of data contained in the format. A raw file includes the ingredients to produce a certain meal, which you can prepare however you choose, while a JPEG is that meal already prepared, with less choice in how you can change it.

Can You Edit Jpeg Photos
Can You Edit Jpeg Photos

There are more ways for correcting exposure problems in raw.

One of the key advantages of taking a picture as a raw image is that the additional tonal and colour data in the file gives you more choices, particularly if you need to adjust the exposure.

White balance is added by the camera in JPEGs, although there are fewer possibilities for modifying it in post-processing. When editing a picture from a raw file, you have full control over the white balance.

In a JPEG, lost information in overexposed highlights cannot be restored. And if the highlights look entirely white in a raw file at first, it might be possible to change certain tones and show highlight information that is still present.
The same can be said for darker, underexposed videos. Shadow information that is irreversibly lost in a JPEG will also be retrieved more successfully in a raw format.
Noise reduction can be extended more easily to a raw format than to a JPEG.

Raw allows for more innovative production options

The camera’s JPEG processing is optimised to create a good-looking image straight out of the camera, and this processing cannot be reversed. A raw video, on the other hand, is interpreted by you, allowing you to choose how the image will appear.

The modifications you make to a raw file in Lightroom can be undone at any moment, giving you the most artistic freedom when processing the file. The key advantages of filming in raw are this versatility, as well as the ability to enhance less-than-ideal exposures greatly.

How much editing is too much?

One disadvantage of Photoshop’s awesome capability is that it is very easy to over-edit a file.
When you have been looking at a screen for hours, you can lose sight of what looks nice and overdo the Vibrance or clarity of your photograph. This may result in an overly intense or “crunchy” picture.

Overly smoothed skin, lacking features (such as regions of too much highlight or too much black), and excessive vignette are a few more tell-tale symptoms of too much editing. If it is a little too much, the picture would “sound” wrong to the spectator, but if it is a lot too much? It could be a complete flop. Have you ever been scrolling through Facebook and come across an ad with a picture that made you pause and take a second look — in a negative way?

Often you cannot yet place your finger on what is wrong with a picture, and other times it is painfully obvious: the model has an unnaturally long arm, there is a strange reflection in the background of something that is absent from the foreground, or the family in the photo all have flawless skin and sparkling eyes.

These are all excellent examples of Photoshop failures, which occur when an inexperienced editor goes too far with Photoshop. Basically, it is poor editing.

Fortunately, avoiding Photoshop Fails is easy. If you keep an original picture layer in your layers browser, you can turn back and forth to see if your edits are realistic or completely out of this dimension.

The most obvious sign that you have gone too far in editing is where the changes you have made begin to detract from the picture itself. If people look at your picture and the first thing they find is the post-processing, it is a fail.

This can happen with every change, but here is a couple to be more cautious of.

DODGING AND BURNING: Good dodging and burning (selective lightening and darkening) should be like a ninja – you should be able to do it without even realising it. If you have a large bright spot over your matter, all people can see is your sloppy work. Less is better in this case, and take care to mix it in.


If the colours are artificial, the audience would be distracted. Instead of focusing on what is going on in your shot, they would be curious why things look strange. When doing colour changes, use a light touch (and be especially careful using the Saturation and Vibrance sliders).


A well-used vignette is a discreet way to keep your audience looking into the centre of your frame and on your theme. However, so much vignette results in a huge ugly black mess around the edges. Get it pliable.


When used correctly, it will significantly improve the edge contrast of a picture. When used incorrectly, it produces bad colour, provides contrast in an unappealing manner, and causes halos along solid lines. It is especially popular right now, which makes it stand out even more.

Image Quality Decreases with too much editing

Losing a description is not the only way to muck up those files you worked so hard to make. When editing, you can reduce the consistency of your image in other ways. Graphic designers are also involved with photo editing. You can learn graphic design at Blue Sky Graphics.